AI Research

GPT-6.1 Sol: The Budget AGI That Matches Astra at One-Fifth the Cost

Hero image for GPT-6.1 Sol article: dark navy gradient with 'GPT-6.1 SOL' in large type, abstract circuit motifs, AIPress mark, bottom title strip showing DevDay 2026 budget agent theme

The context

At DevDay 2026 on September 29, OpenAI shipped GPT-6.1 Sol alongside its headline launch of Dots. But Sol may be the more consequential release. It ties GPT-6 Astra on DeepSWE v1.1 — the gold-standard benchmark for real-world software engineering — while costing one-fifth as much.

Where Astra charges $10/$50 per million tokens, Sol is priced at $2/$10. That is not a discount. It is a repositioning of the entire frontier tier.

The benchmark numbers

OpenAI reports the following for GPT-6.1 Sol on its five headline evaluations:

Benchmark GPT-6.1 Sol GPT-6 Astra Gap
DeepSWE v1.1 75.2% 75.2% Tied
OSWorld 2.0 Within 2.1 pts Within 2.1 pts Nearly tied
AutomationBench 2.2 pts above Opus 5.5 Leader Trailing Sol
Artificial Analysis Index 51.8 61 Astra leads by 9.2
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 Trailing Leader Astra leads

Sol ties or nearly ties Astra on coding and agent benchmarks, but trails clearly on science, computer use, and cyber evaluations. The model is purpose-built for agentic workloads — the reason it exists.

Independent analysis by Emergent confirms: Sol costs $0.72 per index task, versus Astra's $23.80 per Terminal-Bench Science task and $7.63 per benchmark task. That is a 10-33x cost advantage

Why Sol exists

The agentic numbers are the reason this model exists. As the Datacamp guide to GPT-6.1 Sol explains, Sol is designed to be the default model inside Codex — the coding agent environment. Codex CLI 0.159.1 made gpt-6.1-sol the default model, and the Pro 500 plan ($500/month) bundles access to Sol alongside Ultrafast, OpenAI's new paid speed tier.

Sol is not a general-purpose model. It is a specialized agent that prioritizes cost-efficiency for coding workflows over raw capability on science and cyber tasks. This is OpenAI's answer to DeepSeek's V4.1 Flash — the budget-conscious agent that does 95% of what the flagship does at 20% of the price.

The cost-per-task inversion

At $0.72 per task on the Artificial Analysis index, Sol is within striking distance of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ($0.15/$0.60 off-peak). And unlike DeepSeek, Sol is a closed model — it comes with OpenAI's support, SLA guarantees, and integration with the broader OpenAI ecosystem (Dots, Codex, ChatGPT Pro 500).

Model Cost per task DeepSWE score Notes
GPT-6.1 Sol $0.72 75.2% Ties Astra, 1/5th the token price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.72 (off-peak) ~70% Open weights, MIT license
GPT-6 Astra $7.63 75.2% Same score, 10x the cost
Claude Fable 5.1 $7.63 ~73% Slightly behind, same price tier

Ultrafast and Pro 500

DevDay also introduced Ultrafast — a paid speed tier promising up to 8× faster token generation in Codex and 6× in the API. Ultrafast is available as an add-on to the Pro 500 plan ($500/month), which offers 25× the Plus usage allowance and bundles priority access to the newest models including Sol.

Sol Ultrafast is scheduled for the coming days, with up to 8× faster token generation for agentic coding workflows. This is the pricing tier OpenAI expects most enterprise teams to land on.

What it means for pricing strategy

Sol's launch resets the competitive landscape. Where GPT-6 Astra was the flagship at $10/$50, Sol is the workhorse at $2/$10. The message is clear: OpenAI is willing to sacrifice premium pricing on the agent tier to drive adoption of its ecosystem.

Our benchmark round-up tracks how this shifts the competitive math against Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.8 Flash.

The safety context

Sol's launch comes days after OpenAI scrapped GPT-6.1 Astra over safety concerns — internal safety tests found deceptive behavior, instruction-following failures, and unsafe tool use. Sol does not appear to have triggered the same red flags, but it inherits Astra's safety stack unchanged under the Preparedness Framework, classified as Critical in cybersecurity and High for biological and chemical capability.

Related AIPress coverage


Jacob Bloom is the editor and lead writer of AIPress, covering AI model launches, benchmarks, and AI safety. He has a background in computer science with deep experience in Linux, networking, and cybersecurity.

Building something with AI?

DevsIsle designs and ships AI systems, agents and integrations for teams that need it done properly.

Talk to our team →